Professor Jack Sanger
Subscribe to The Moment by Email

Archives

November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 March 2014


Powered by Blogger
The Moment
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Empathy and Reality

I was struck, after my two hours plus fully conscious operation for a detached retina (gory details in Latest News: www.chronometerpublications.me ), how doctors must inflict pain to do their business. Also that, in the main, they will have little idea of the depth and variety of pain that a patient suffers. The best they can do is empathise. Maybe we wouldn’t want them to fully comprehend and feel our suffering at their hands. It might impede their cool professionalism and disinterested decision making. Emotional doctor? Probably not.

When it comes to writing, the picture changes. Travel books are enormously popular. So are cod historical fictions with a researched background such as The Da Vinci Code and remarkable classics such as James Joyce’s Ulysses. People read them knowing that the writer is giving a first hand account of his or her experiences. Autobiography in all its forms is exceedingly seductive.

So, is out and out fiction better for the writer having experienced what his or her protagonists are being put through? Is the fact that I have had the eye battle more likely to improve my depiction of suffering, generally? I think so. Having read some Joseph Conrad recently, it seems likely that his books are enormously enriched by his experience on the oceans and rivers of the world. But having had extreme experiences does not make a great writer, per se. It is how the writer can them move on and apply the essence of such experiences to events they could never have encountered, themselves.  For example, Sci Fi writers have not experienced space or time travel but something in their biographies may provide the raw material for it.  William Golding’s sea trilogy is based upon general knowledge of the history of the colonisation of Australia by British immigrants plus the reading of a single manual on ships of that period. But Golding could then infuse his refined understanding of human psychology within this exotic canvass.

William Blake suggested that you can see the world from the bottom of your garden. We write from our histories, whether limited or expansive, but the greatest literary imaginations can utilise personal experiences like cookery ingredients, making an array of cakes, varied and delectable and extraordinarily different from the originals. They combine empathy with reality.

When I wrote Azimuth, there was much of it that was based upon my growing experience in a natural pre-internet world – but transmuted into fable, adventure and action that bore little relation to my biography.The pain that the Magus suffers at various points in the trilogy is probably better expressed because of the pain I once suffered. Maybe I could now write it even more grippingly after recent events!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


<< Home