Professor Jack Sanger
Subscribe to The Moment by Email

Archives

November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 March 2014


Powered by Blogger
The Moment
Friday, May 04, 2012

The Art of Writing No. 29


A possibly difficult area for any novelist concerns writing about the opposite sex. We know that in a number of genres, male-written books tend to make women sex objects, crime victims and adornments to their hard drinking, all-action heroes. On the other side of the coin, there are women writers who portray men in an equally simplistic manner; lantern-jawed, tousle haired, romantic and strong. Or whatever. Dan Brown’s books give little insight into character, not that it has affected sales since the plot line appealed to a readership that wanted conspiracy and religion tied into a narrative bundle. And what better title than The Da Vinci Code? If Brown had managed real depth of character maybe the books would have won an even greater audience – and literary prizes. The point being made is that writers often portray the opposite sex as little more than clothes hangers.

I wrote earlier that  writers need to challenge and test the possibility of stereotyping in their work. Are the characters rounded? Do they do unexpected things? Are they shaded from good to bad? Are there as many female as male minor characters in the general background of your tale?

It is worth spending time on characters you have introduced. You may base them on people you have known or you may invent them from the mélange of types that swim in your head. If you are a male writer, are you sure you are making your women independent of you and not the stuff of your fantasies? Or payback for hurt? Or an unfulfilling relationship with your mother? The opposite for female writers. The cliché is that women are emotional and men are rational, women have intuition but can’t read maps, particularly dim blondes. Men are not in touch with their emotions and take risks. Women multi-task and men are serialists when it comes to work. Any reading of research on cognition would make you dismiss most of this as claptrap. It is better to evolve complexity and forget gender until it actually matters in conflict, sex or other interactions between the sexes.

In Azimuth there are many more strong and unusual women than men. The main protagonists are equally divided in gender. By being determined to display a whole range of types, both male and female, over the ten years of writing the three volumes, the pages became peopled by idiosyncratic individuals. As I’ve suggested before about writing Zen aphorisms, once you get into the swing of developing new ways of seeing and writing, the muscle hardens and the work becomes easier. Early female readers have told me they love the women and can find much to identify with. Perhaps you will find the same when you read it but I’d be as interested if you don’t!

Azimuth by Jack Sanger at www.azimuthtrilogy.com
Azimuth Book 1, 2, 3 separate also in Kindle Amazon

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


<< Home