Professor Jack Sanger
Subscribe to The Moment by Email

Archives

November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 March 2014


Powered by Blogger
The Moment
Friday, April 27, 2012

The Art of Writing No. 24


I thought I’d mumble on a bit about first person and third person characters in your writing.

In many ways, writing in the first person is more difficult because it challenges the reader to identify with the ‘I’ in your story as opposed to ‘he’ or ‘she’.  There is a far greater degree of distancing when your hero or heroine is depicted in the third person.  The reader has choice as to how much s/he identifies with your central character when ‘he ‘or ‘she’ does this or that, whereas if it is an “I’ who is doing it, the reader is faced with the direct question as to whether he or she would ever do such a thing or feel like that. Given the way that most narratives are, it is also easier to write in the past tense. The past tense also allows some distancing and emphasises the storification of people’s lives. "The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there",  was the wonderful line by L P Hartley that emphasises my point. We are used to being entertained in this way, from early childhood fairy tales.

Writing in the present tense is not particularly unconventional but it is a strain on the writer. Having written a novel in the continuous first person present about a Marlowe-like Private Dick, The Strange Attractor’ I found when I started editing for the third time, I still had sections that had slipped into the past tense. You may be better at it than me! The real difficulty is in conveying dramatic action. “I am punching him as he grabs my throat. I fall back, half-exhausted” or, “I press my lips against hers and watch as her eyes half close but a glint…”  can be very effective and even seductive but you have to do it through the whole novel. The third person present tense is a little easier, maybe. But nowhere near as easy as third person past tense.

In Azimuth, all but the first Tale is in the past tense but in the first Tale I use the continuous third person present. I wanted to draw the reader into the birth of the central character in all the Tales and make it dramatic. It starts the whole train of events, lasting 3 books and 920 pages! Since it happens while the mother is being hunted down by assassins it was an effort of concentration to keep to the format.

Mixing first and third person narratives can give a multi-dimensional set of perspectives on a Tale as events are seen through different characters’ eyes. Mixing past tense and continuous present provides an equally rich range of possibilities as we move from a past period to the present. If you prefer to map out your work before you start, you can work out the different media you are going to utilize to make your work truly gripping. If you are more organic in your approach, you will find yourself wrestling with the narrative constantly – but, we hope, fruitfully.
The Strange Attractor by Eric le Sange, Kindle Amazon

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


<< Home