Professor Jack Sanger
Subscribe to The Moment by Email

Archives

November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 March 2014


Powered by Blogger
The Moment
Tuesday, April 24, 2012

The Art of Writing No. 22


What differentiates a professional writer from a writer, i.e. any literate individual? In the last blog I showed examples of how we must interfere with regular brain patterns to produce something worth reading as a fictional artefact. Just because everyone can run doesn’t mean that they are athletes worth entering for prizes and being watched by millions. Obviously, being a professional writer involves discriminating your text from the humdrum realities of every day communication. Under normal circumstances your brain is tuned to do the minimum required to accomplish any act. So – knitting is difficult at first and requires programming the brain to do pearl and plain and follow graphic patterns but soon you can knit and watch the television – or, during the French Revolution, watch heads roll under the guillotine. Knitting is relegated to an autonomous part of the brain.

Establishing a unique style that is communicative and expressive and draws readers into your world needs an interference with basic brain patterns, as I have said. Just as with knitting, editing our writing is extremely onerous and laborious at first. By being ruthless with our work, appraising every word, finding better similes and metaphors, cutting out flab and all the tiny acts of improvement in which we must engage, our writing becomes more honed and effective. And, like knitting, as we exercise our brain muscle and write in a disciplined way every day, we find the need for drastic editing actually diminishes. Our brains become configured to what becomes known as our ‘style’. This does not mean that editing becomes eliminated. Not at all. But it does mean that editing can concentrate on felicitous expression rather than the chopping away of crude surpluses. Raymond Carver, long regarded as the master of the concise short story, never mastered it. Latterly, it turns out that his unheralded editor did it. Whether true or not, the essence of the story is that it is in the editing that style is finally nailed to the page.

It took me three months to edit Azimuth, with professional help and I still find slight wrinkles that irk me.It took my alter ego, Eric le Sange, a month to do the same for The Strange Attractor.
www.azimuthtrilogy.com
The Strange Attractor by Eric le Sange Kindle Amazon

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


<< Home