Professor Jack Sanger
Subscribe to The Moment by Email

Archives

November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 March 2014


Powered by Blogger
The Moment
Monday, April 23, 2012

The Art of Writing No. 21

A further note on writing dialogue.

People speak with different sentence lengths or breaks, they use personal metaphors, their language varies in richness and substance yet much of what passes for speech in novels is barely differentiated. The writer often uses his characters to talk the plot along but not deepen our sense of individuality.

Trying to separate out characters has to be done via our descriptions of what they look like, what they wear and some account of how they speak. By doing this the writer builds a mental construct for each character and should enter that construct every time the character talks. Reading aloud what has been written helps to pinpoint what is different about the individual – particularly reading dialogue aloud with or to a friend.

From the reader’s perspective each character is signposted. A verbose person is easily differentiated from a brusque one, a child’s metaphor and simplicity of language from an adult’s, an individual’s acuity from a dunce’s denseness. Gradually, as empathy with each character becomes more easily experienced and transposed into text, dialogue takes on a robust strength and the writer finds that he or she does not need to scaffold conversation with constant descriptions of how the character is speaking or feeling (“he interjected angrily”, “she said sadly”, “he agreed amusedly” etc). As I pointed out in an earlier blog, once framed  a conversation can elicit much that you don’t need to put into words. Much of the time a question mark, a few dots or an exclamation mark delicately steers the reader through the conversation as though he or she is listening with a glass at the wall of a private chamber.

In The Strange Attractor I tried always to maintain the central character’s flip, Marlowesque speech patterns but diluted by his sense of impotence at events. In Azimuth I spent much of the time in female characters. Many of them and all different. It was a test to create speech patterns that served their profiles.

www.azimuthtrilogy.com
The Strange Attractor by Eric le Sange Kindle Amazon 
Twitter @profjacksanger


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


<< Home